Tuesday, April 29, 2025

The view from 1975: BLOOD ON THE TRACKS

 

(This originally appeared in a another version in  the San Diego Reader, 1975).
In the waning days of 1974, as the hoi polloi queued for Led Zeppelin’s latest eruption of amplified bravado, the rock critics, their brows knitted in a familiar fret, awaited Bob Dylan’s *Blood on the Tracks* with the hushed anticipation of cloistered scholars. The masses could revel in their sonic bacchanals, all sweat and decibels; the critics, those fastidious sentinels of taste, craved something weightier, a voice to parse the nation’s disquiet. Dylan was no mere troubadour—he was a chameleon, a poet of the asphalt and the soul, whose nasal hymns had once seemed to reorder the stars. His pronouncements demanded attention; symposia were convened, pens poised for annotation. Perhaps this exaggerates the fervor, but for years, the press had swaddled him in a cocoon of expectation, their adulation both tribute and burden. Now, rumor held that *Blood* was his homecoming, a retreat from the facile mysticism and barroom bonhomie of recent years. I settled into my chair, skeptical, curious for the inevitable sleight of hand. The critics, it appeared, had already uncorked their champagne. *Blood on the Tracks* is Dylan as his acolytes remember him: the harmonica’s thin, asthmatic wail, like a wind skittering through a deserted alley; a voice that stumbles and gasps, tethered to no rhythm save its own caprice; lyrics that cascade in a torrent of images, defying meter yet thick with private meaning. It is the Dylan of yore, the Greenwich Village bard reborn, and the critics greeted him with open arms. The counter culture's tip sheet *Rolling Stone*, in high ceremony, banished its usual reviews to make room for a pair of ponderous essays—Jonathan Cott and Jon Landau, high priests of the moment, flanked by a chorus of eminent voices, with only Dave Marsh’s dissent piercing the hosannas. The verdict was near-unanimous: a triumph, a poet’s return, a tapestry of genius. Familiar praises, repolished to a gleam. Yet what unsettles is the ardor itself, a kind of collective yearning. From my modest perch in Clairemont, far from San Francisco’s bohemian haze—where rock stars seem to embody the fan’s unspoken longings—*Blood* feels less like a revelation than a simulacrum, a deftly crafted echo of a voice grown faint. Dylan sounds detached, a performer playing himself for an audience he no longer trusts. It is as if, wearied by the chase, he has lain down in the snow, offering his bones to the circling pack. The image is not a kind one. Once, I too fell under Dylan’s spell. In the acne-scarred fervor of junior high, his sneer was a talisman, his mystique a lantern in the suburban dusk. He was untouchable—defiant, electric, a man who spurned the world’s judgment with a curl of his lip. His life was a mosaic of excess: the endless road, glimpsed in the flickering frames of D.A. Pennebaker’s grainy verite *Don’t Look Back*; the rumored pharmacopoeia—amphetamines, perhaps heroin, a brush with acid; whispers of liaisons with Allen Ginsberg, apocryphal or not, that lent him the sheen of a Byronic rogue. He was a poet of America’s underbelly, his songs spilling forth like dispatches from a frontier aflame. *Highway 61 Revisited*, *Bringing It All Back Home*, *Blonde on Blonde*—these were his gospel, a sound sui generis, jagged and alive. His early folk forays were a young man’s masquerade, aping the ghosts of blues and hillbilly bards; what followed *Blonde* was a retreat into domesticity, a softening that drained his fire. *John Wesley Harding* offered glimmers—parables refracted through a biblical lens—but it lacked urgency. *Nashville Skyline*? A friend, now estranged, once claimed it taught him “rednecks are human too.” I swallowed a grimace. To hear *Blood on the Tracks* is to confront the ghost of the Dylan devotee. In 1966-67, he was our mirror, our savior, singing for the awkward, the inward, the boys scribbling verse in lamplit bedrooms, haunted by the draft and the weight of their own inertia. Life was a cocktail of dread and ennui, the suburbs a velvet cage. Dylan’s tangled curls, his reedy defiance, his “go to hell” lyrics—they were a dream of escape, a way to defy the cul-de-sacs without stepping beyond the lawn. He carried our burdens, a scapegoat for a generation too cosseted to follow Kerouac’s dusty road. Time dulled that enchantment. I turned to rawer sounds—Grand Funk’s blunt force over the Moody Blues’ ethereal drift—seeking not insight but obliteration. Dylan, stung by the tepid sales of *Planet Waves* and *Before the Flood*, chose to appease his flock. *Blood* is the result, but it is a warped mirror, reflecting a past that no longer breathes. If *Blood* is a feint, it is also a confession. Dylan abandoned his speed-freak persona for survival’s sake—such fires consume their keepers. To demand that old ferocity is to court a corpse. Recapturing *Highway 61* is like bottling a storm. So, with coffee cooling and cigarette ash lengthening, I watch the record turn. “You’re Gonna Make Me Lonesome” begins—Dylan’s voice nasal, laced with a theatrical sincerity, as if Elvis were crooning for a supper club. The guitars plod, the harmonica sputters like a failing engine, a nod to Gerdes Folk City for those who missed the myth’s first act. He veers off-pitch, scatters references to Rimbaud and Delacroix, teasing the annotators. Who is this for? “Tangled Up in Blue” fares better, its voice truer, but it lacks revelation. “Simple Twist of Fate” stumbles. “Lily, Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts” reaches for *Highway 61*’s surreal shimmer but collapses into cliché, a tale told too often. The platitudes gather like dust, stifling the air. My cigarette burns to its nub; I resist the urge to halt the needle. This is a bitter pill from a man who once seemed to hold the cosmos in his throat. Yet I gleaned my Dylan truths long ago—I should not mourn. New voices beckon: Little Feat’s earthy pulse, Roxy Music’s urbane glitter, Harvey Mandel’s sinuous lines, perhaps Queen’s baroque audacity. The band lumbers on, Dylan mimicking himself with a faint, knowing smile, as if he sees through his own charade. The parade has passed, its banners faded. The record ends, the arm lifts. I turn on the radio, and Led Zeppelin’s primal wail floods the room—a coarser, truer song.

I AM TIRED OF DRYING THE CAT BY HAND --a chat with Barry Alfonso and Ted Burke



Barry Alfonso
Time for Jamul to re-load?
Ted Burke
THE HAIRY EYEBALL ogles a moist towelette.
Barry Alfonso
Skinplate had some OJ you wouldn't believe.
Ted Burke
THE geek detector runs on Duracel
Barry Alfonso
Where are you now, Jake...and where are my bitcoins?
Barry Alfonso
In Santee, "drying the cat by hand" means taking a single woman out to dinner, saying flattering things to her, picking up the check and then giving her the phone number of your brother-in-law, I understand.
Ted Burke
It has been said that "drying the cat" means mispronouncing the names of jazz musicians like Theolonious Monk and Ornette Coleman in an Telegraph Avenue methadone clinic. "Drying the Cat By Hand" is a variation heard in the Tenderloin and up to North Beach, meaning that you announce to Amiri Baraka that Boots Randolph played better sax than Coltrane or Shorter.
Barry Alfonso
I've also heard that it is a derivation of the old blues expression "shave 'em dry," meaning to cut off the head of a glass of beer with a straight razor before attacking someone in the solar plexus over a Stetson hat.
Ted Burke
I've heard tell of that as well and it makes me wonder if that is related to the practice of ordering a shot and beer and dry towel twisted into a rat tail and snapped cruelly to the back of the drinker's bare neck by everyone in the bar named either "Earl" or "Ondine".
Barry Alfonso
A lot of this has been lost and confused over the years, I suspect -- a "dry cat" used to be slang for a guy with a flat top and bad dandruff. It was a custom to rub scalps like that for luck before a dice game or before rubbing spices into a jerk chic…
See more
Ted Burke
There was the habit among dairy farmers of rubbing their bovines with mewing kittens for no real reason; "drying the cow" became "drying the cat" over time, an understandable conflation, and the implication of the phrase is that one is standing around irritating another living creature for no good reason. But since when does anyone need a good reason to irritate someone?
Barry Alfonso
That's right! Now I remember. Will Rogers did a bit about this and in fact got arrested in Tulsa for demonstrating how it was done. There's a famous photo of Junior Samples from Hee Haw "drying the cat by hand" behind Stringbean's back when he thought the cameras were off.
Ted Burke
*Absolutely! This in turn inspired Pynchon's famous opening line of his magnum opus 'The Crying of Litter Box 29". "A dry cat came screamng across the sky..."
Barry Alfonso
Right, that was a literary in-joke for many years standing. Hemingway took a swing at Frank Yerby after he wrote that Papa had been drying the cat with both hands for years...
Ted Burke
On a related note, Norman Mailer misunderstood Russell Kirk when he announced that what really wanted was a "cat dried by hand". Mailer took this to be a translation of Parsian street slang used among working girls meaning that the person who uttered the phrase was in desperate need of being buggered, but that lacked the needed ticket for admission.Mailer told Kirk that he had his ticket "right here" and demanded Kirk "give up the cat." William Buckley was amused by the whole thing and had Mailer on his tv show several times.
Barry Alfonso
Well, I do remember Gore Vidal giving Buckley the hairy eyeball on TV during the '68 Democratic convention and saying, "You really are drying the cat by hand a little hard tonight, old boy" while Buckley let something moist and shiny collect above his upper lip.

Friday, April 25, 2025

THE STOOGES IN THEIR ELEMENT

 


Iggy Pop was a drummer in blues bands before he and his fellows formed the Stooges in the 60s, and as this song demonstrates, the experience wasn't wasted. Iggy and his mates understood, that is to say, felt the vaguely described but conspicuous force that blues had, simple, sonic, repetitive and impolite to any standard measure of tempo. This was the kind of music that was the blend of instinct and wits, a boxer's set of reflexes to things that get in your way. Guitar, drums and are a distorted grind and the tempo of nails hammered.

The Ashtons smashed mightily. Iggy, of course, was the man alone, a three-semester course of unreconstructed Id that inhabiting the center of every ganglion of nerves the brain tried to lay claim to; the superego to twitch and become more reptilian by the second. He was that kid in drainpipe jeans who carried a sharp stick with a brown, mung encrusted nail through it, waiting on the corner for someone as yet unknown to walk by and get poked with it. There was no fun, so you made your own, just to see what happens. These were Mailer's White Negros for a fact, except they shivved me a man who was tailing them and talking too much in the other muse mute streets of two-story burn pads and deserted storefronts that had their front windows sealed with concrete and layers of old concert posters and spray paint exclaiming gang signs and Jesus. Anyone daring to talk past this kid deserved to be whacked with the rusty nail. It was cruel and pointless until something genuine happened to change everything; the bit that everyone knows in the world of the Stooges is that transcendence is not on the agenda, ever.

No band embraced nihilism with more profound off-handedness than The Stooges. Part of their genius lies in t their lyrics, hardly cliché but not conventionally poetic, these were rhymes that were spare and simple, and powerfully to the point, talking about the small matters of frustration that send the young mind into paroxysms of rage and self-recrimination. Ever say something or overheard a phrase from someone else uttered in exasperation or another kind of brain locking state where what is said is so starkly simple and clear and unadorned by apology or other sorts of mental equivocation that it resembles brilliance? That’s my take on the collective lyrics of the Stooges, words as an instinctive reflex, Nor was their music dependent on the trivial concern of instrumental virtuosity.
This was the sticking point with many critics at the time when their first album, The Stooges, was released in 1969. In a counter-culture that was ironically putting premiums on the extreme professionalism of well-trained musicians who could hit notes precisely and improvise at length over increasingly tricky time signatures, the Stooges were the textbook example of the anathema, an insult to the taste-maker elite. Reviews were generally insulting to the band’s repetitive slam and clang approach, and it is one of the wonders of staying alive long enough to see a groundbreaking band, unfiltered from the start, outlast the negativity and change the critical consensus. The intelligentsia had to catch up with them. The Stooges rejected formal instruction on their musicianship and, in turn, weren’t about to suffer the instructions the snoots and snobs demanded they follow.

What’s ironic is that Rolling Stone, the arbiter of quality in matters of the New Rock, still had integrity in their record reviews at the time and allowed one of their original rock critics, Ed Ward, to let the air out of the inflated importance of over-serious rock music and the earnest critiques they inspired by his review of the album. The first two paragraphs have Ward offering a thumbnail sketch of the band’s background, quickly followed the expected litany of sins, that Iggy is a bad Jim Morrison imitator, the lyrics are sub-literate, the guitar and drum work is lifeless and lacking even the dignity of being mechanical. The something wonderful happened halfway through. He summarized his feelings thusly “Their music is loud, boring, tasteless, unimaginative and childish.” Then something remarkable happened.
With the grievances listed, and the verdict delivered,Ward added, in a single sentence, standing alone , unencumbered by other sentences, “I kind of like it”, Ward performed an endearing bit of proto-deconstruction, using the aforementioned deficiencies in the music as examples of virtue, value, honesty, artistic vision. It was one of the great pieces of rock criticism because here Ward created the basis of real aesthetic argument that maintained, essentially, that the Stooges were the true face and sound of a rock and roll that was relevant to life as it was being lived by millions, a voice, sound, and poetry from the curb, alley and shuttered doorway that wanted nothing to do with millionaire musicians with long hair striving to achieve legitimacy by mimicking and misreading the most superficial elements of High Culture. Ed Ward established the concerns that Lester Bangs soon picked up and turned into a masterful argument with the dying of the light. We can thank Ed Ward and the Stooges for that relief.
This was a band that went in the other direction when they began their quest to find what lay beyond avant-garde posturing in Music during the 60s away from trudging drum solos and long-form guitar essays. Iggy and the Stooges were primitive, out of tune, irritated and irritating in turn. It was a matter where the band and their frontman, Iggy Pop (nee Stooge) blended perfectly, given their ability to turn something that sounds horrible and repetitive into a crashing, sustained drone of attitude, and Iggy's serpentine stage presence and clipped verbal dexterity. He was the guy who couldn't sit stand and would stand for nothing less than what he wanted in full, and they were the grind of the city turned into a droning inner voice prodding him to smash down whatever walls came before him. It wasn’t that he was a bad boy going contrarily to the niceties of all things middle class and calcified, it wasn’t that he as a sentient being had identified an artifice he disliked and defined himself in opposition to it; it was more like Iggy Stooge was unaware of the feelings of others, greater ramifications of dangerous self-gratification, or any code of behavior the rest of us depend on keep drivers and pedestrians, for example, on the streets and the sidewalks, respectively. He was the unadulterated id, a squirming mass of impulse that transgressed boundaries, mashed together poetry and porn, and displayed no interest in theorizing about what he had done or about what he was thinking of doing. His was the case of living in the present tense solely, and whatever sensation presently was utmost.
Let us not be mistaken about this, as Iggy Stooge’s persona and psyche had the virtue of being monochromatic; his immediate impulse was not the only thing that mattered. There simply wasn’t anything else. All this play against the quarrelsome insomniac raunch of Ron Ashton’s guitar work, elementary, rudimentary, undeniable effective, endlessly influential. What he lacked in technique he made up for in essence, a counterpoint to the corrosive thrills of Iggy’s distilled juvenile delinquency; his guitar work might be politely described as “steady”, but this a dodge against the annoyance factor this band turned into a new aesthetic. “Persistent” is more apt, like a dislodged bit of a fender dragging along the highway, kicking up sparks near the gas tank, or a door slamming for hours in a strong wind, or jackhammers at night carving up your street at precisely the moment your brain demands you sleep or die inanely. Obnoxious, profound without knowing. We should all be grateful these guys wielded musical instruments, not guns. Or worse.